Piloting Local Innovation Support Funds

About LISF

Prolinnova piloted a new mechanism to make funds for agricultural research and development accessible to farmer experimenters and local agencies supporting them. The Local Innovation Support Funds/Facilities (LISFs), as described in IK Notes 85     (PDF: 33 KB)       and the 2012 policy brief (PDF: 193 KB), are managed and used by farmers and community-based organisations (CBOs), with initial support by local NGOs. The LISFs give farmers a chance to do their own research that is relevant to solve local problems and that takes into consideration their values and knowledge. They can also hire external support. LISFs are important to guarantee the long-term sustainability of farmer-led Participatory Innovation Development (PID) through the institutionalisation of supportive funding.

The first phase (FAIR 1 - Farmer Access to Innovation Resources) (MS Word: 59 KB) was one of 12 winners in the DURAS (Promoting Sustainable Development in Agricultural Research Systems) Competitive Grant Scheme. Action research on setting up and managing LISFs was carried out in Cambodia, Ethiopia, South Africa and Uganda. FAIR 1 was coordinated by the Farmer Support Group (FSG), the NGO then coordinating Prolinnova–South Africa. In early 2008, a synthesis paper drew on the initial results, challenges encountered and ways of organising the activities in the countries involved (Prolinnova Working Paper #24: FAIR: Synthesis of Lessons Learnt (PDF: 1.21 MB).

FAIR 2 (proposal) (PDF: 195 KB) started in April 2008 with support from Rockefeller Foundation. It was implemented in eight countries: the above four plus Ghana (North), Kenya, Nepal and Tanzania. The Prolinnova International Secretariat at ETC Foundation, Netherlands, coordinated this phase. FAIR 2 focused on better understanding the functioning of the LISF and its effectiveness and impact as a mechanism to accelerate local innovation. The phase involved the following activities:

  1. Implementation and M&E of LISFs in the eight countries: A comprehensive M&E framework was used to capture key findings across the countries and to document the process and results. During regular virtual and face-to-face meetings, all participants reviewed progress and adapted and realigned strategies.

Contact Details

Syndicate content